Token
PUMP token fundamentals: supply, unlocks, fees and valuation
How much PUMP is in circulation, how much its documented vesting model still has to release and to whom, what the network or protocol earns in fees, and its market cap and fully diluted value set beside those fees, with every input printed.
PUMP token fundamentals
Measured 2026-10-27T01:15:32+00:00 UTC. Measurements, not forecasts: a multiple is a level, not a direction.
Supply and valuation
| Circulating | 460.88bn (46.1% of max) |
|---|---|
| Max supply | 1.00tn |
| Supply source | CoinGecko (AGGREGATOR ONLY — the Hyperliquid spot token with this ticker is a different asset) |
| Market cap (circulating) | $1.98bn |
| Fully diluted value | $4.30bn |
| Float vs FDV | MC/FDV 0.4609 · gap $2.32bn not yet in the float |
| FDV basis | mark price $0.00 × max supply 1.00tn (CoinGecko) |
| Supply-basis gap | DefiLlama's documented vesting model totals 760.00bn tokens through 2029-07-13, -24.0% versus the max supply used for FDV. The model documents less than the max supply, so no FDV is computed on its total; the FDV above uses the max. |
Forward supply and unlocks
| Forward supply (chain) | UNVERIFIED futureEmissions is an on-chain field and the Hyperliquid spot token with this ticker is a different asset (see the IDENTITY disagreement) |
|---|---|
| Next scheduled unlock | 2026-11-11: 6.88bn tokens, cliff, to insiders (insider/investor class) DefiLlama's documented vesting model |
| Scheduled, next 30 days | 6.88bn tokens (1.49% of circulating, $29.56m at mark); insider/investor class 100.0% DefiLlama's documented vesting model |
| Scheduled, next 90 days | 20.62bn tokens (4.48% of circulating, $88.67m at mark); insider/investor class 100.0% DefiLlama's documented vesting model |
| Scheduled, next 365 days | 82.50bn tokens; insider/investor class 100.0%; documented schedule ends 2029-07-13 DefiLlama's documented vesting model |
| Model note | The 24% allocated to Community & Ecosystem was scheduled to unlock 50% at TGE and 50% monthly for a year. A portion of the TGE releases was send to Squads vault addresses and remain undistributed as of July 2026. The monthly unlock schedule has not been followed either, so we've marked this allocation as TBD |
Fees and revenue (protocol: pump)
| Fees 24h / 30d / 1y | $5.20m / $179.23m / $1.22bn |
|---|---|
| 30-day run-rate vs 1y | $2.18bn annualised vs $1.22bn actual (+78.8%) |
| Revenue 1y (kept by protocol) | $480.61m (39.4% of fees) |
| Holders revenue 1y | $303.84m (24.9% of fees) |
Valuation vs fees and revenue (trailing 1y)
| MC / fees · FDV / fees | 1.6x · 3.5x = $1.98bn / $1.22bn and $4.30bn / $1.22bn |
|---|---|
| MC / revenue · FDV / revenue | 4.1x · 8.9x = $1.98bn / $480.61m and $4.30bn / $480.61m |
Where the sources disagree
- IDENTITY: the Hyperliquid spot token named PUMP reports 1,046,526,764 circulating while CoinGecko's PUMP (pump-fun) reports 460,882,479,339, a 0.00227x ratio. Those are two assets sharing a ticker, so the chain reading is NOT used for this perp; supply falls back to the aggregator, labelled.
- Fee run-rate: the trailing 30 days annualise +78.8% versus the trailing year ($2,180,596,858 vs $1,219,793,405). Stated as a measurement; no forecast is attached.
Field states: emission_30d PASS · emission_90d PASS · fees PASS · forward_supply UNVERIFIED · price_to_fees PASS · price_to_revenue PASS · revenue PASS · supply PASS · unlock_schedule PASS · valuation PASS. Sources: Hyperliquid chain (tokenDetails), DefiLlama (fees, revenue, unlocks page), CoinGecko (cross-check).
How to read this page
Every figure is a measurement taken at the time printed above the tables. None of them is a forecast, and a multiple is a level, not a direction. Where a field could not be read, the table says so and prints the reason instead of a number.
Fully diluted value multiplies the mark price by one supply total, and the sources do not always agree on that total. The FDV basis row names the total used. When the vesting model documents a different total, the gap row prints it. When that total is larger than the max, the row also prints the FDV it would give; when it is smaller, the model covers only part of the supply and no second FDV is computed.
Scheduled unlocks come from a published vesting model and are dated by that model. Fees and revenue are trailing figures. Supply is cross-checked across sources, and where two sources disagree the disagreement is listed rather than resolved quietly.
Other tokens
- BTC token fundamentals
- SOL token fundamentals
- LIT token fundamentals
- ENA token fundamentals
- DOGE token fundamentals
- VVV token fundamentals
- ZRO token fundamentals
- WLD token fundamentals
- XPL token fundamentals
More from Ticker Breakdown
Technical readings on stocks and ETFs are on the indicators hub. See a complete worked breakdown in the free sample, or get the free monthly SPY breakdown. To ask whether a token is on our working roster, write to us.
Free monthly report
The monthly SPY breakdown, at no cost
Once a month we run the same breakdown we sell, on SPY, and publish it in full. Every indicator reading on daily, weekly and monthly, what each one reads right now, and the places they contradict each other. The current edition is the 36-reading document below.
Or read what the monthly edition covers, or see every past edition, before you hand over an address.