TICKERBREAKDOWN

Back issues

Every past monthly breakdown, on request

Each month's SPY breakdown is published in full and then archived. The count, the contents and a whole disagreement from every edition stay public below. The document itself is one email away.

The current edition

September 2026 · SPY · edition 2026-09-30

6 higher · 16 lower · 14 no lean (of 36)

  • The count
  • Price, moving averages and Fibonacci Retracement levels
  • Reversal Score and exhaustion
  • Options positioning and Put/Call Skew
  • Where the signals disagree
  • Indicator roster

One of the 8 disagreements, in full

ACROSS INDEPENDENT FAMILIES

Family groups point opposite ways

exhaustion -1.000 · momentum -0.250 · trend +0.000 · volume +0.700

The volume group(s) lean one way while the exhaustion, momentum group(s) lean the other. These families are treated as independent evidence, so this is genuine conflict rather than one signal counted twice.

The other 7 disagreements, the 36 readings behind the count and the full roster are in the document.

Printed straight out of the published document. Nothing here is a summary we wrote about it.

Correction, 1 October 2026: two readings were counted twice in our published editions. In the August and September 2026 editions, the daily Sequential Exhaustion Count appears twice in the indicator roster, once in the timeframe grid and once as a separate timing row. In the July, August and September 2026 editions, the daily Volume Flow (CMF / OBV) row is built from the same two daily indicators as the Chaikin Money Flow and On-Balance Volume rows, which are counted on their own, so those indicators had a second vote. Corrected tallies, each reading counted once: September 2026, 6 higher · 14 lower · 14 no lean (of 34). August 2026, 11 higher · 11 lower · 12 no lean (of 34). July 2026, 11 higher · 9 lower · 5 no lean (of 25). An earlier version of this note, the same day, named only the first cause and gave totals of 35. The editions are kept exactly as published. From the October 2026 edition each reading is counted once.

The same document, on your own ticker

Every edition above is the breakdown we sell, run on SPY. Send us your ticker, we confirm we can build it before you pay, and you get the same document on it: every reading on the daily, weekly and monthly, and every place they disagree. One PDF within 48 hours, one price, nothing recurring.

Earlier editions

August 2026 · SPY · edition 2026-08-31

11 higher · 12 lower · 13 no lean (of 36)

  • The count
  • Price, moving averages and Fibonacci Retracement levels
  • Reversal Score and exhaustion
  • Options positioning and Put/Call Skew
  • Where the signals disagree
  • Indicator roster

One of the 6 disagreements, in full

ACROSS INDEPENDENT FAMILIES

Family groups point opposite ways

exhaustion -1.000 · momentum -0.450 · trend +0.725 · volume +0.600

The trend, volume group(s) lean one way while the exhaustion, momentum group(s) lean the other. These families are treated as independent evidence, so this is genuine conflict rather than one signal counted twice.

The other 5 disagreements, the 36 readings behind the count and the full roster are in the document.

Printed straight out of the published document. Nothing here is a summary we wrote about it.

Correction, 1 October 2026: two readings were counted twice in our published editions. In the August and September 2026 editions, the daily Sequential Exhaustion Count appears twice in the indicator roster, once in the timeframe grid and once as a separate timing row. In the July, August and September 2026 editions, the daily Volume Flow (CMF / OBV) row is built from the same two daily indicators as the Chaikin Money Flow and On-Balance Volume rows, which are counted on their own, so those indicators had a second vote. Corrected tallies, each reading counted once: September 2026, 6 higher · 14 lower · 14 no lean (of 34). August 2026, 11 higher · 11 lower · 12 no lean (of 34). July 2026, 11 higher · 9 lower · 5 no lean (of 25). An earlier version of this note, the same day, named only the first cause and gave totals of 35. The editions are kept exactly as published. From the October 2026 edition each reading is counted once.

Enter your email and this edition opens on the next page, the same way the current one does.

July 2026 · SPY · edition 2026-07-31

12 higher · 9 lower · 5 no lean (of 26)

  • The count
  • Price, moving averages and Fibonacci Retracement levels
  • Reversal Score and exhaustion
  • Options positioning and Put/Call Skew
  • Where the signals disagree
  • Indicator roster

One of the 7 disagreements, in full

ACROSS INDEPENDENT FAMILIES

Family groups point opposite ways

exhaustion -0.600 · momentum -0.375 · trend +0.425 · volume +1.000

The trend, volume group(s) lean one way while the exhaustion, momentum group(s) lean the other. These families are treated as independent evidence, so this is genuine conflict rather than one signal counted twice.

The other 6 disagreements, the 26 readings behind the count and the full roster are in the document.

Printed straight out of the published document. Nothing here is a summary we wrote about it.

Correction, 1 October 2026: two readings were counted twice in our published editions. In the August and September 2026 editions, the daily Sequential Exhaustion Count appears twice in the indicator roster, once in the timeframe grid and once as a separate timing row. In the July, August and September 2026 editions, the daily Volume Flow (CMF / OBV) row is built from the same two daily indicators as the Chaikin Money Flow and On-Balance Volume rows, which are counted on their own, so those indicators had a second vote. Corrected tallies, each reading counted once: September 2026, 6 higher · 14 lower · 14 no lean (of 34). August 2026, 11 higher · 11 lower · 12 no lean (of 34). July 2026, 11 higher · 9 lower · 5 no lean (of 25). An earlier version of this note, the same day, named only the first cause and gave totals of 35. The editions are kept exactly as published. From the October 2026 edition each reading is counted once.

Enter your email and this edition opens on the next page, the same way the current one does.